Technology experts and industry players are calling for changes to Ghana’s proposed National Information Technology Authority (NITA) Bill, 2025.
They say some parts of the Bill could place heavy pressure on startups and small technology businesses.
At the same time, they acknowledge that Ghana needs stronger digital laws to support the country’s growing technology sector.
The proposed Bill forms part of a wider digital reform agenda led by Samuel Nartey George and the Ministry of Communication, Digital Technology, and Innovations.
The reforms include bills on data protection, emerging technologies, and the development of the digital economy.
Supporters say the new laws show a stronger commitment to digital governance and innovation.
The current NITA law was passed in 2008, long before modern technologies such as artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and advanced cybersecurity systems became common.
Despite support for reform, concerns remain over proposed fees and penalties in the Bill.
Under the current framework, fintech companies face accreditation fees of GHC 20,000, while e-commerce providers pay GHC 10,000.
The proposed Bill also includes penalties ranging from GHC20,000 to GHC50,000 for non-compliance.
Critics say such costs could hurt small businesses and discourage innovation.
According to the article’s author, Divine Puplampu, these charges could become “existential barriers” for young startups operating with limited resources.
The article compares Ghana’s proposal with systems used in countries such as Kenya, Rwanda, Estonia, and Singapore.
Kenya introduced a Startup Act that gives young companies temporary exemptions from some licensing fees.
Rwanda uses a tiered system where smaller ICT companies face lighter compliance requirements.
Meanwhile, Singapore applies regulations based on company size and risk levels.
Critics say Ghana could adopt similar measures to support local startups.
The article highlights five key issues in the proposed Bill.
These include high fees for startups, possible conflicts of interest involving NITA’s role, and mandatory certification for ICT professionals.
The author also raised concerns about data sovereignty and the financial independence of the tribunal that would settle disputes involving NITA.
According to the article, requiring government certification for private ICT workers could create delays and worsen brain drain in the sector.
Industry players say the Bill should go through wider consultation before Parliament approves it.
They argue that Ghana’s technology ecosystem is still developing and needs policies that encourage growth rather than create barriers.
The article warns that heavy regulations could push talented developers and entrepreneurs to move to countries with friendlier digital policies.
It also calls for startup protections, lower compliance costs, and faster review systems to keep Ghana competitive in Africa’s digital economy.
